Damning Investigations and Brutal Testimonies
PsychForce Report TV News Roundup with Rob Wipond & Jesse Mangan
It’s a damning, brutal edition of PsychForce Report TV, as Jesse Mangan and I discuss some of the biggest news stories about involuntary commitment.
If you’d prefer to read the article on which these discussions are based, including more news stories not covered in the video, you can read it here.
Jesse and I are still learning about how to do these PsychForce Report TV editions, so please give us your feedback!
And if you see important news stories about involuntary commitment, please flag them to me on X or email news@robwipond.com for future news roundups on PsychForce Report.
And if you’d like to hear more of Jesse Mangan’s excellent work, check out his Committable podcast.
I can´t resist this one:
When I was a teen, I saw an antisocial, a very vicious one sharing his most likely neuroleptic laced lunch with other teens, and assaulting students to rob them their lunch. Among the begging and the cajoling, etc. And he went into these rage fits when frustrated in his antisocial intents, I saw him, I stopped him from potentially sexually abusing teenage girls younger than him. And he was not alone: he got collaborators in stalking and harassing teenage girls.
It might seem innocuous to the not so savvy: one neuroleptic dosage can´t do much harm when Psychiatrists claim those are "very safe" medications and withdrawal psychosis is not a thing, so they say. It is always the underlying undiagnosed unaccepted long term incurable genetic brain disease!.
Well, no, it might have happened some of those kids developed withdrawal psychosis and got medicated neuroleptics and diagnosed improperly and viciously with a Psychotic disorder, and it all because a kid did not wanted to have the side effects of the prescribed and unsupervised medication ordered by his at least negligent psychiatrist and his guardian. Most likely because of a conduct disorder.
And it might seem fantastic, but it reminds of the Pellicot Case, not saying such is the case: one antisocial is prescribed a dangerous medication he uses against other people because he is an antisocial and Psychiatrists and Clinical Psychologists claim they don´t "catch" all antisocials.
And I imagine what happens with a person with auditory commanding hallucinations who decides to stop his or her voices by medicating someone else?, like a minor.
What about a teacher who under the deception those neuroleptics are safe medicates willy nilly over active students?.
What about a food provider in the same hallucinatory deluded situation with easy access to her own medication?, lacing random strangers she serves food to?, just because she sees something she saw while inside a Psychiatric Hospital on some random dude. Why?, because those medications either cause hallucinations, are ineffective or just stop working and Psychiatrists will never admit such things are even possible. And they will never accept Psychosis can be caused by medications used criminally, not even by their patients, while perhaps being aware they are capable of that and more.
And Psychiatrists from what I´ve read are very vocal and very active in covert medication with neuroleptics.
And similar cases where people for whatever reason decides to covertly medicate another person. Withdrawal psychosis is a thing, and in México neuroleptics can be acquired without an ID, without a prescription and without the patient going in person to pick them up at the pharmacy. As far as I remember it was reported in the News.
Just imagine the antisocial Physician offering an "enemy" in his delulu a coffee laced with a neuroleptic. It is possible, right?, those people know and have seen it.
And Psychiatrists most likely profit from not saying a word such things are possible and need to be stopped.
They don´t give a hoot because all Psychoses to them are brain genetic incurable diseases, and they are trying to do good!. Despite all the evidence to the contrary...
And then, how does one get such into the news?.
Who is going to collect the evidence?, who is going to do the investigative reporting?, the criminal prosecutions?, the lab analysis on food, blood, hair, nails, etc.?
No one cares, and if they did, most likely it would be to harm other people...
And on top of that, more than a year ago the Mexican Supreme Court abolished involuntary psychiatric treatments because they violated the International Treaties binding the Mexican Government.
It got in the News, but my guess is psychiatrists in México still kidnap people despite the Binding Jurisprudence of our Top Judiciary Body.
My guess is they could not care less, otherwise they wouldn´t make a dime.
There was this joke: Out of Psychiatric Residence what Psychiatrists did was to chase crazy People on the Street, like ambulance chasing Lawyers, but far worse.
Then, a few years ago there was this interesting Mexican Supreme Court Case, I did not read enough to figure out all the details, so I might be wrong on that one, but from what I imagined a dude signed a therapeutic contract to let him out of a State Social/Medical Insurance Psychiatric Hospital.
Then he got locked up again and could not get out because of the contract of the San Fernando Psychiatric hospital part of the IMSS, the biggest Social/Medical Insurance in the Country for non Governmental Workers and their Families.
He went to trial, and apparently, my speculation, the only way to get out was to change his signature so the therapeutic contract was void. So, the Federal Electoral Institution had to go into the Hospital since he could not get out, to receive his request for a new ID and give him his new Federal Electoral ID.
Such are my conjectures, hunches and guesses.
But, there are several cases of forged notarized documents in México, and the way to invalidated them from here on is precisely to change one´s signature in an official ID, so I´ve read by a lawyer familiar with chasing the effects of such notarized forged documents.
One can change names in México!, but then one has to change and re-request all official documents, like School/University Diplomas, etc.
But my guess is most Psychiatrists in México don´t even look at IDs, they just attack people on the street, commit them by force and make a paltry profit by harming and making people suffer. Like sicarios who do not charge what a human life is worth.
And those contracts violate the State of the Art practice of Medicine: One needs to see the patient in person inside a facility fulfilling all legal requirements. No hearsay diagnosis based on third person narratives of mere symptoms, no diagnoses on the street, etc. But Psychiatrists are notorious for doing that, specially Child Psychiatrists.
This is not news, but I saw decades ago a case of two people I knew, a Medical Schoolmate and a former High School friend chasing a "crazy" person on the street and on public transportation.
It was an incredible sight, those are not your average ACTs, those guys are really vicious. My HS friend was dressed as a medical student, and from her professional diploma she did not go to Medical School. Her career apparently was not even Health Related.
And it has happened to me several times, and some of those dudes and gals seem to have long term harmful effects of neuroleptics, some exhibit sort of dyskinetic features, and some akatishic impulsivity, and some sort of temporary rage facial expression giving me the impression they really cannot control themselves when scared even a little.
And from what I´ve seen, some of these chasing "crazy" people on the street individuals behave like Psychiatric residents or Psychiatric nurses, it gives me the creeps because it looks so cultish.
And my Med School mate did spoke of a sort of omerta, like the mob, but he was not the most reliable witness: he was so crazy talking and behaving, and so out of reality, among others far worse he was recommending his sister to go into med school, despite al the verbal and psychologic abuse we got in just first year alone. It was creepy, several school mates cringed in disgust, yet they collaborated with him. It was like they put me in a class with a lot of antisocials, and it figures to me why, complicated story.
And it is weird, but it does explain to me the narratives of gang stalking or community mobbing people tend to elaborate in fanciful ways: the CIA, MK-Ultra, Satellite Mind control, UFOs, Illuminati, Reptilians and the like.
But, to me, most likely it is just psychiatric mobbing passing as keeping the community safe and helping the "deluded" see the "light", there´s an irony there, by some of the most unsavory characters: tardive dyskinetics, tardive akathisics, antisocials, deluded, and maybe hallucinatory persons.
I know it sounds incredible, but I have seen it with my own eyes, and the craziness is part of the concealment: who is going to believe such?, hence the CIA MK-Ultra stuff, when sadism, Psychiatry and money are more apt as explainers.
But then, how does that get into the news?.
See my case: Last year I told some journalists that in México it is a requirement to see the Professional Diploma and Professional License of all Physicians in their consulting offices, with a clearly visible photograph in them.
I have never seen such.
And yet, none of those journalists actually took effective interest despite near the time when I told them such there was the case of Marilyn Cote, faking being a Psychiatrist prescribing a lot of Neuroleptics without the Credentials, the licenses to do so. That was last year. And as soon as the news got out his "practice", there´s an irony there too, was shut down by the Health Authorities, most likely because she had forged photocopies of those documents. From what I gather not having those originals with a picture of the Professional is a Health Risk meriting the closing of the facility: immediately upon visual inspection by a proper Health Authority. And yet, my guess, people in México are not aware of that.
Then around that time there was the case of an anesthesiologist having in Hospital intravenous controlled medications he kept outside of the Hospital.
And those medications require for the patient to pick them up in person with their official ID at the drug store: Physicians cannot carry them, let alone use them on the streets, without those medications being picked up as I narrated.
Then how does a psychiatrist, a psychiatric nurse or a paramedic gets a depot neuroleptic to apply to any person on the street?. It violates several laws:
Medical Diagnoses are not made on the street.
Informed willing consent per Supreme Court Jurisprudence is required, inability to consent is not valid since such Jurisprudence.
Those medications are to be applied inside the Hospital or picked up, if at all, at the Drugstore in Person with an official ID. Depot neuroleptics are dangerous to apply outside Hospitals. Very dangerous.
Involuntary commitments were decided by committees composed of all medical specialists needed for each individual before such commitment was even ordered, no post-factos allowed, and that was before the Supreme Court Jurisprudence.
It goes against State of the Art of: No hearsay medical diagnoses.
And then some: like the requirement of keeping those medications under lock, literally, with registration requirements Individual Physicians cannot comply with, they are not Hospitals.
And I have evidence they break those laws, at least in my case.
And yet, not journalist showed me effective interest despite I have some documentation of it beyond my testimonials.
So much for journalism and news...